I am not Charlie Hebdo

433637I-am-not-Charlie
This is not yet another massacre by Islamic fundamentalists. This time the victims are people who have made a career out of giving offence in a country where giving offence is legal and is called free speech.9/11 pushed the world into a tragic war were the only winners were arms dealers, Charlie Hebdo may well push us into hardening untenable stands on free speech, which may further worsen the clash of civilisations.The courageous outpouring of solidarity with the victims all over the world is the correct immediate response to this tragedy but we need to rethink the framework of free speech.It is clear as the light of day that making fun of Islam is setting yourself up as a high-profile target with rich dividends for terrorists.But does that mean that one should not do it?

It is a natural tendency to take the maximum liberty that the law allows, and to that extent the people at Charlie Hebdo are certainly not at fault.With complete unconditional sympathy and heartfelt sorrow for the victims, the Charlie Hebdo massacre is a result of not evaluating the consequences of our actions, by which I mean the actions of the French government.Let me illustrate my point with a hypothetical but highly plausible scenario-suppose small children were killed in the crossfire between the terrorists and security forces, and consider for a moment that the parents of those children always hated the stuff that Charlie Hebdo published.Would the family of those children be holding “Je suis Charlie” placards? These are the questions that we must ask, rather than stay trapped in the same rhetoric.

Right to freedom of speech and self-expression is an important human value and must be exercised within the framework of humanity.Making it criminal to slap somebody but perfectly legal to maliciously mock his most profound beliefs seems ridiculous.If we assert that the pen is mightier than the sword than surely the wounds that it inflicts must hurt just as bad or worse! As a creative person there is nothing I value more than free speech backed by the protection of my government. As an agnostic I have a lot of bones to pick with religion. I tweeted that “Religion is a blanket with a God shaped hole in its centre, which can be used to comfort, muzzle or hang oneself”,only after evaluating that it was a reasonable statement to make, with full cognisance that religion is dear to more than six billion people for good reasons.

The companion of “religious fundamentalism” is “free speech fundamentalism”.While the first asserts that a holy book is above human interpretation, the second hijacks free speech completely even at the cost of collateral damage to the process of pragmatic dialogue in society. I hanker for the right to criticise religion but also feel that the space for that activity should be a civilised one, and not built on the foundation of a blank cheque of free speech which becomes a licence for religious bigotry.Asserting that by not defending the right of publications like Charlie Hebdo to deliberately offend, we may be giving the terrorists a veto on our thoughts is taking as hard a position as the fundamentalists themselves.

As far as the French are concerned their stand that religion is a purely private matter leading to banishment of religious symbols(head scarves, crucifixes et al) from public spaces appears at loggerheads with an unfettered right to mock religion.”You may not practice your religion in public as it may offend others but you may criticise those same practices publicly with complete right to give offence” seems to be the flawed position. Hundreds of millions of peaceful muslims all over the world will be justified in viewing the west with suspicion when it supports inflammatory lampooning of what is most precious to them. Mahatma Gandhi when asked what he thought of Western Civilisation replied “It would be a good idea.”His mischievous retort aside we must recognise that we live in a divided world which cannot heal if we rub the salt of the Prophets cartoons on festering wounds.

India does not give this kind of free speech blank cheque to its citizens and that has surely prevented a lot of loss of life.Quite frankly we wont be able to handle the French brand of free speech and an extension of this harsh reality is that the world as a whole is not ready to handle it either.The repercussions of the stupid American policy of gun ownership is confined to their borders but unconditional free speech has created tragedy the world over.Along with a global village, the world has also become a global battlefield where the repercussions of a cartoon appearing in a Danish publication can lead to murder and mayhem in far off India. While with our history of constructive pluralism spanning millenniums, we have been wise enough to temper free speech with caveats, and those very safeguards have been widely misused in India to persecute artists and intellectuals, MF Hussain being the most pertinent case in point, apart from numerous senseless book banning, all completely unacceptable actions.

Lampooning the Prophet is a misuse of free speech that ill serves the current global order.It is imperative that in such a world we call a spade a spade without hurting the feelings of the spade, because an angry spade can hurt us real bad.Ultimately we need to give our children a world filled with less hate.

Lets protect God for now, since he cannot sue for libel.



Categories: Politics

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

6 replies

    • Yes i read this one with great interest and the many comments too.. His view and mine are not too far apart and ultimately he just takes a high ” all or nothing” stand which is counterproductive in the real world.

      • Hi Amit,very profound,loved your usage of metaphors in this blog piece ie The companion of “religious fundamentalism” is “free speech fundamentalism and we live in a divided world which cannot heal if we rub the salt of the Prophets cartoons on festering wounds.The most sensible blog on this issue I have read so far..allow me to share it?

        Rgrds

        Saira

  1. Amit, yet another impressive post from you. I have been a long time reader and enjoy your blog.
    I cannot help but agree with you more here. We live in a world where the human mind is subject to unrealistic levels of information and stimulation and is forced to make sense of it all instantly. Our brains were never made for this-yet, entire societies now latch on extreme positions of one kind or another just to ‘belong’. The need for belonging is a basic one and takes precedence over laboring over silly things like facts of the issue or worse still, taking out time to judge them on their merit or on old fashioned virtues like fairness and tolerance. There have been so many articles written about how the digital movement led by facebooks and twitters of the world is giving voice to the individual and bringing an end to tyrannous regimes around the world. One may do well to spare a thought about the horror it may end up stoking if propelled in the wrong direction. One million people on the streets of Paris today as well as 40 Presidents and PMs is one such example too.
    This morning I sat and translated all the cartoons published by Charlie Hebdo on this contentious issue. I could see no satire and no message-just pure hatred. Maybe it’s my untrained and narrow mindset but I cannot fathom any circumstance where such cartoons add any value to anyone. The reason why Europe has stringent ‘hate-speech’ laws is because they, more than any other continent, have suffered the consequence of mass xenophobia and we can already see resurgence of those tendencies in many countries. There is no reason why the logic of ‘hate-speech’ laws should not be extended to popular media as well as the digital landscape today. Xenophobia along with, and in many ways because of a bad economy is a dangerous concoction that may be too much for a declining Europe to handle.

  2. How if i tell you , the right to swing you arm stops where the other person’s nose begins , and what if i abuse Abhijit’s mother and take her photograph or her cartoon and make the wildest of things or just a little naughty something like stripping her clothes on the net and let others share my art according to my imagination or ask people to make more imaginative things and announce a prize for the winner , oh! i forgot what about SAVITA BHABHI , although i have not seen any of her , maybe after i watch i can post something later on after watching, i don’t think Abhijit is going to think mind as i think he is LIBERAL .For his information if he feels it is okay with him i would like to draw to his attention that the Prophet (pbuh) is DEARER than one’s parents and everybody else .This is not to ridicule Abhijit but just to make a point , can i ask you a question – are you to willing to die for for someone ? and the day you feel that just remember there are millions willing to die for the Prophet (pbuh) , that requires tremendous love ,respect , admiration etc for a very cool , calm , composed , kind etc .Although Allah and His messenger do not need our protection but it’s the sheer love (but volatile ) which is the undoing .

Love to hear from you....

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: